Abstract

Following the fundamental recognition of its involvement in sensory-motor coordination and learning, the cerebellum is now also believed to take part in the processing of cognition and emotion. This hypothesis is recurrent in numerous papers reporting anatomical and functional observations, and it requires an explanation. We argue that a similar circuit structure in all cerebellar areas may carry out various operations using a common computational scheme. On the basis of a broad review of anatomical data, it is conceivable that the different roles of the cerebellum lie in the specific connectivity of the cerebellar modules, with motor, cognitive, and emotional functions (at least partially) segregated into different cerebro-cerebellar loops. We here develop a conceptual and operational framework based on multiple interconnected levels (a meta-levels hypothesis): from cellular/molecular to network mechanisms leading to generation of computational primitives, thence to high-level cognitive/emotional processing, and finally to the sphere of mental function and dysfunction. The main concept explored is that of intimate interplay between timing and learning (reminiscent of the “timing and learning machine” capabilities long attributed to the cerebellum), which reverberates from cellular to circuit mechanisms. Subsequently, integration within large-scale brain loops could generate the disparate cognitive/emotional and mental functions in which the cerebellum has been implicated. We propose, therefore, that the cerebellum operates as a general-purpose co-processor, whose effects depend on the specific brain centers to which individual modules are connected. Abnormal functioning in these loops could eventually contribute to the pathogenesis of major brain pathologies including not just ataxia but also dyslexia, autism, schizophrenia, and depression.

Highlights

  • The cerebellum is classically thought to control movement coordination (Flourens, 1824; Luciani, 1891) and motor learning (Marr, 1969; Albus, 1972) but recent experimental evidence suggests that it may play a key role in cognition and emotion (Schmahmann, 2004; Schmahmann and Caplan, 2006; Ito, 2008) 1

  • This clearly raises broader questions: how can the same circuit cope with so many different tasks? Is signal processing in the cerebellar circuits always based on the same computational scheme? Is it conceivable that what underlies the different roles of the cerebellum is the specific connectivity of cerebellar modules, rather than specific microcircuit properties? In order to

  • These can be broadly divided into those addressing (1) how the olivo-cerebellar system generates www.frontiersin.org its internal representations and operations, (2) how the emerging functions derive from connections of the cerebellum with other brain structures, and (3) how dysfunction of the system could lead to pathology

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The cerebellum is classically thought to control movement coordination (Flourens, 1824; Luciani, 1891) and motor learning (Marr, 1969; Albus, 1972) but recent experimental evidence suggests that it may play a key role in cognition and emotion (Schmahmann, 2004; Schmahmann and Caplan, 2006; Ito, 2008) 1. META-LEVELS OF SIGNAL PROCESSING IN CTCC LOOPS So far we have considered observations suggesting that the cerebellum, in addition to taking part in sensory-motor control, is involved in cognitive/emotional functions. These observations are based on evidence of cerebellar activation during specific cognitive/emotional tasks and on the existence of connections between the cerebellum and relevant cerebro-cortical areas. The basic hypothesis is that the cerebellum uses, throughout, the same circuit structure, and that different outcomes depend on the specific connections to different brain areas This implies that the same code is used for all the operations involving the cerebellum and that motor control and cognition/emotion have an equivalent structure at the level of spike coding. There is substantial evidence that the cerebellum takes part in the pathogenesis of DD

Findings
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.