Seeking a sound index of competitive intensity: Application to the study of biomass production under elevated CO2 along a nitrogen gradient

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this paper is to evaluate (i) the relevance of currently proposed measures of competitive intensity to elevated CO2 studies by means of an example analysis, hypothesizing that competitive intensity is increased under elevated CO2; and (ii) an alternative method for predicting species performance in mixtures from monocultures. Relative competition intensity (RCI), relative physiological performance and normalized ecological performance were used to characterize the competitive ability of two grasses (Danthonia richardsonii Cashmore, Phalaris aquatica L.) and two legumes (Lotus pedunculatus Cav., Trifolium repens L.) grown in monocultures and mixtures of the four species along a N gradient under conditions of ambient and elevated CO2. Relative competition intensity could not be used to predict competitive outcomes in mixtures under conditions of elevated CO2 because it failed to account for changes in the size of interspecific differences along the N gradient and between CO2 concentrations. Relative physiological performance and relative ecological performance were more useful for investigating biomass production in mixtures and to predict species performance in mixtures from their performance in monocultures. Both indices of relative performance showed an increase in competitive intensity under elevated CO2 conditions. They also showed a decrease in competitive intensity with increasing N supply over most of the range of N supply, but a reversal of that trend at high levels of N supply. The merits and utility of these relative performance indices for elevated CO2 are discussed.