Abstract
ABSTRACT This study investigated how political symbols influence affective polarization through emotions. Integrating research on visual communication, social identity theory, and the affective contagion hypothesis, we theorized that partisan symbols compared to national symbols would exacerbate affective polarization—and that anger, anxiety, and enthusiasm mediate this process. An experiment (N = 1,013) found the expected emotional impact and mediation effects—partisan symbols compared to national symbols indirectly influenced affective polarization through these emotions. Theoretical implications are discussed in the context of mounting concerns over rising polarization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
