Abstract
High Andean forests harbor a remarkably high biodiversity and play a key role in providing vital ecosystem services for neighboring cities and settlements. However, they are among the most fragmented and threatened ecosystems in the neotropics. To preserve their unique biodiversity, a deeper understanding of the effects of anthropogenic perturbations on them is urgently needed. Here, we characterized the plant communities of high Andean forest remnants in the hinterland of Bogotá in 32 0.04 ha plots. We assessed the woody vegetation and sampled the understory and epiphytic cover. We gathered data on compositional and structural parameters and compiled a broad array of variables related to anthropogenic disturbance, ranging from local to landscape‐wide metrics. We also assessed phylogenetic diversity and functional diversity. We employed nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) to select meaningful variables in a first step of the analysis. Then, we performed partial redundancy analysis (pRDA) and generalized linear models (GLMs) in order to test how selected environmental and anthropogenic variables are affecting the composition, diversity, and aboveground biomass of these forests. Identified woody vegetation and understory layer communities were characterized by differences in elevation, temperature, and relative humidity, but were also related to different levels of human influence. We found that the increase of human‐related disturbance resulted in less phylogenetic diversity and in the phylogenetic clustering of the woody vegetation and in lower aboveground biomass (AGB) values. As to the understory, disturbance was associated with a higher diversity, jointly with a higher phylogenetic dispersion. The most relevant disturbance predictors identified here were as follows: edge effect, proximity of cattle, minimum fragment age, and median patch size. Interestingly, AGB was efficiently predicted by the proportion of late successional species. We therefore recommend the use of AGB and abundance of late successional species as indicators of human disturbance on high Andean forests.
Highlights
High Andean tropical montane forests can be found between ca. 2,700 and 3,300 m in the Northern Andes, extending from Venezuela to Ecuador, with considerable levels of species diversity and endemism (Gentry & Ortiz, 1993; Girardin et al, 2014; Killeen et al, 2007; Still et al, 1999; Young, 1992)
We found that the increase of human-related disturbance resulted in less phylogenetic diversity and in the phylogenetic clustering of the woody vegetation and in lower aboveground biomass (AGB) values
| 2112 species diversity and composition of tree and understory layers? (b) What are the effects of facilitators and causes of disturbance on species diversity, phylogenetic structure, functional diversity, and aboveground biomass? (c) Which vegetation variables are best indicators of disturbance?
Summary
High Andean tropical montane forests ( bosques altoandinos) can be found between ca. 2,700 and 3,300 m in the Northern Andes, extending from Venezuela to Ecuador, with considerable levels of species diversity and endemism (Gentry & Ortiz, 1993; Girardin et al, 2014; Killeen et al, 2007; Still et al, 1999; Young, 1992). According to the available literature, the most relevant disturbance factors, which variation proved to be significantly related to differences in forest species composition or diversity metrics, are as follows: age of forest fragment (Köster et al, 2009; Laurance et al, 2006), proximity to houses or roads and people and livestock density (Ribeiro et al, 2015, 2016), edge effect, and proximity to pastures (Parra Sánchez et al, 2016; Werner & Gradstein, 2009), as well as forest cover fragmentation metrics (Fahrig, 2003; Hertzog et al, 2019; Laurance et al, 2006) It has not yet been tested whether these factors would be still relevant when a larger number of variables are considered simultaneously. | 2112 species diversity and composition of tree and understory layers? (b) What are the effects of facilitators (parameters that increase the likeliness of disturbance) and causes (direct sources) of disturbance on species diversity, phylogenetic structure, functional diversity, and aboveground biomass? (c) Which vegetation variables are best indicators of disturbance?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
