Seeing and believing: Observing desistance-focused practice and enduring values in the National Probation Service

Sam Ainslie

doi:10.1177/02645505211005031

Abstract

This article focuses on the feasibility of using a desistance-focused approach in the National Probation Service (NPS) in the post-Transforming Rehabilitation (TR) context. Findings are drawn from an exploratory study undertaken in one NPS Division, which used triangulation of three data collection methods: observations of one-to-one supervision sessions, documentary analysis and practitioner focus groups. Findings show that practitioners use elements of a desistance-focused approach, although not exclusively. Values based upon belief in the capacity to change and the need to offer support endure, despite mass organisational upheaval. The article concludes by suggesting that this ‘enduring habitus’ of probation could be an enabler for a desistance-focused approach but instrumentalism in policy and practice is a significant barrier.

Highlights

This article is based on findings from a small research study undertaken in 2018 which sought to explore the impact of theoretical and empirical findings emergingIn a commissioned academic review as part of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Offender Engagement Programme (2010–2013), McNeill and Weaver (2010) highlighted that it was possible to operationalise desistance research and identified principles relevant to probation practice
Triangulation has been used in previous probation research (e.g.: Bauwens, 2010; Phillips, 2011; Tidmarsh, 2019) as an effective means by which to capture the complexities of probation practice (Durnescu, 2012)
Observations highlighted the complexity of supervisory practice within the National Probation Service (NPS) and the skills required by practitioners

Summary

Introduction

In a commissioned academic review as part of the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Offender Engagement Programme (2010–2013), McNeill and Weaver (2010) highlighted that it was possible to operationalise desistance research and identified principles relevant to probation practice. They argued that probation practice needs to be shaped by eight general desistance principles that include: 1. Being realistic (in recognition that it takes time for offenders to change and lapses are to be expected); 2. Respecting individuality and avoiding taking a ‘one-size fits all’ approach; 6. Promoting redemption and recognising efforts to give up offending

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion