Abstract

The Upper Cretaceous Bajo Barreal Formation (San Jorge Basin, Argentina) is a fluvial succession mostly composed of channel sandstones interbedded with thicker floodplain deposits dominated by tuffaceous strata. The goal of this contribution is to infer the provenance of the unit through combined petrographical and geochemical data of channel sandstones, primary tuffs and tuffo-psammites (reworked, no-mixed tuffs). Channel sandstones are dominantly litharenites and feldspathic litharenites with abundant participation of volcanic lithic fragments with different textures (porphyritic, eutaxitic, felsitic, pilotaxitic, trachytic and vitric-vitrophyric), pumice and plagioclase. K-feldspar, quartz and sedimentary rock fragments are scarce. QFLu diagram and several provenance indicators including dominance and textural types of rock fragments, K-feldspar/plagioclase ratio and inclusion-free quartz grains indicate a provenance from felsic to intermediate, pyroclastic-rich, arc-related volcanic rocks. This interpretation agrees with the values of various elemental ratios of trace elements such as La/Sc, Th/Sc, Cr/Th, Eu/Eu ∗ and (La/Lu) N and discriminant functions based on major elements. Pyroclastic floodplain strata are commonly pumice-rich, occasionally glass shard-rich, vitric tuffs suggesting an origin from plinian-like eruptions. Subordinate components include volcanic lithic fragments, quartz, orthoclase and plagioclase. Zr/Ti versus Nb/Y and SiO 2 versus K 2O diagrams, as well as a multi-element diagram of selected trace elements shows that the pyroclastic rocks were originated from medium-K content, intermediate, arc related magmatic source. Considering the palaeoflow direction towards the east and south-east and presence of subduction processes along the western margin of Patagonia during the Late Cretaceous, it is interpreted that Bajo Barreal Formation constitutes the sedimentary record (distal facies of volcano-flanking fan or apron) of this coeval volcanic arc. Channel sandstones probably were mostly derived from the Divisadero Formation volcanic rocks because of similar petrographical features and REE pattern. In contrast, pyroclastic tuffaceous floodplain deposits would be derived from vents located over the actual outcrops of the Patagonian Batholith.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.