Abstract
A fault-tolerant conference-key agreement protocol establishes a shared key among participants of a conference even when some malicious participants disrupt key agreement processes. Recently, Tseng proposed a new fault-tolerant conference-key agreement protocol that only requires a constant message size and a small number of rounds. In this paper, we show that the Tseng’s protocol cannot provide forward and backward confidentiality during a conference session for the proposed attack method. We also show that a simple countermeasure—re-randomizing short-term keys of some participants—to avoid the proposed attack can be broken by extending the proposed attack method.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
