Security for the small: materializing securitization in Finland and Norway

Abstract

ABSTRACT Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 ruptured Europe’s security constellation, leading to historically neutral Finland and Sweden to seek NATO memberships. While there is literature on how NATO influences country’s security apparatus, the impact of NATO on smaller states’ securitization capacity remains unclear. We undertake 1) a discourse analysis of Norway and Finland’s three respective Arctic strategies, 2) a discourse analysis of two online Arctic newspapers ‘High North News’ and ‘The Barents Observer’, and 3) an analysis of the allocation of Finnish and Norwegian military spending from 2014-2022. We explore both countries as cases where one is a historic member of NATO and the other is not. Despite this, both states share similar structural security risks such as Russia’s geographic proximity. We periodize securitizing dynamics related to the Arctic, matching it to changes in the Finnish and Norwegian military sectors. Given small states lack relative material capabilities, we argue there is a systematic deadlock in transforming securitizing moves into material action. However, as a NATO state, Norway exhibits a significantly higher level of participation in military maneuvers and additional securitizing behavior compared to Finland. By contrast, Finland relies more heavily on intense securitizing rhetoric without accompanying material actions.