Abstract
Test compression is widely used for reducing test time and cost of a very large scale integration circuit. It is also claimed to provide security against scan-based side-channel attacks. This paper pursues the legitimacy of this claim and presents scan attack vulnerabilities of test compression schemes used in commercial electronic design automation tools. A publicly available advanced encryption standard design is used and test compression structures provided by Synopsys, Cadence, and Mentor Graphics design for testability tools are inserted into the design. Experimental results of the differential scan attacks employed in this paper suggest that tools using X-masking and X-tolerance are vulnerable and leak information about the secret key. Differential scan attacks on these schemes have been demonstrated to have a best case success rate of 94.22% and 74.94%, respectively, for a random scan design. On the other hand, time compaction seems to be the strongest choice with the best case success rate of 3.55%. In addition, similar attacks are also performed on existing scan attack countermeasures proposed in the literature, thus experimentally evaluating their practical security. Finally, a suitable countermeasure is proposed and compared to the previously proposed countermeasures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
