Abstract

Traditionally, securitization has been viewed as a product although it could more properly be described as a financing technique. This article looks at the history and background of securitization since its inception in the early 1980s and discusses why labels can be misleading and, in some instances, dangerous. It addresses the development from “true sale” to “whole business securitization,” including differences between the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the U.K. Insolvency Act. It concludes with a brief examination and commentary on the E.U. Capital Requirements Directive and some of the dangers that arise when regulators stretch a concept too far.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.