Abstract

The dawn of quantum computing casts a long shadow over the once-assured realm of digital security. The conventional encryption is trembling at the prospect of quantum-powered attacks. This problem seems to be solved with the existence of post-quantum cryptography which brings a glimmer of hope that pierces the shadow cast by quantum computing. However, forging these shields is no easy feat. Beyond brute computational power, the true challenge lies in seamlessly weaving them into existing systems without compromising user trust, the threads that bind our digital lives. To achieve this, a delicate dance is needed - prioritizing the legal aspect to robust the security without disrupting the familiar rhythm of our online interactions. The research employs an empirical juridical approach as its method. For data collection, a thorough exploration of literature, including laws, books, journals, and relevant sources, is conducted. Radbruch's tripartite ideal of justice, expediency or suitability for a purpose, and legal certainty underscores the fundamental role of effective legal frameworks in mitigating vulnerabilities. This principle applies acutely to PQC regulation, where the absence of international guidelines amplifies nation-state susceptibility to quantum computing attacks. On the other hand, In the context of PQC migration, every government must meticulously consider several key factors to ensure effective and compliant implementation. Hence, the presented solution endeavors to tackle the aforementioned inquiry from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call