Abstract

In each species, natural selection has resulted in an optimal litter size, to ensure the largest average number of surviving offspring and the lowest maternal mortality. The terrestrial insectivores from which the primates evolved had large litters. It has been argued that in primates adaptation to an arboreal mode of life led to a reduction of litter size to a single offspring because of the difficulty of producting and caring for a large litter in a tree [6]. A recent critical survey of the literature indicates that twinning frequency in most nonhuman primates is lower than in man [20].There are clear ethnogeographic differences in the incidence of human twinning. Among peoples of Eastern Asia, multiple maternities are rare; in Japan for instance, the twinning rate is only 3-7 per mill, according both to the official statistics and hospital records. These low rates seem not to be caused by the facts that it is customary in Japan to have children very early in life or that twin births were at one time viewed with displeasure and concealed, or sometimes twins were even killed in some areas [21].In hospital series among some Negro tribes almost 10 times higher twinning frequencies than among Japanese have been reported e.g. the Yorubas in western Nigeria with values above 60 per mill [24]. However, where national birth statistics of Blacks are available, twinning is lower, e.g. in U.S.A. 13-15 per mill [1].

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.