Abstract
ABSTRACT The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of India which offers a mode of reorganisation for distressed corporations prevents promoters and directors with non-performing assets from submitting plans to rescue their company. This provision is contained under section 29A of the IBC. Judicial interpretation has required corporate reorganisations under India's Companies Act to give effect to the limitations under section 29A as well. The introduction and application of section 29A is reflective of a broader scepticism towards allowing promoters and directors whose companies entered financial distress from regaining control. This article evaluates whether section 29A has addressed the problems it had set out to and finds that some ineligibilities prescribed for the incumbent management under section 29A can be relaxed. It also uses the example of the United Kingdom's insolvency regime (with which India bears similarities) to explain why resolution plans from the incumbent management should not be disallowed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
