Secrets, Sex, and Spectacle: The Rule of Scandal in Japan and the United States. By Mark D. West. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2006. Pp. viii+368. $45.00 cloth.

Abstract

Secrets, Sex, and Spectacle: The Rule of Scandal in Japan and the United States. By Mark D. West. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 2006. Pp. viii+368. $45.00 cloth. West offers a colorful as well as penetrating account of the making of Japanese scandals. Using the United States as a baseline for comparison and analyzing cases from all realms of public life (business, entertainment, politics, sports, religion, and education), he argues compellingly that law, social organization, and culture combine to determine the logic of scandal in Japan. The book does an excellent job of showing how Japanese law affects the social and legal dynamics of high-profile cases. Significant factors at work here are the organization of Japanese prosecutors, lack of whistle-blowing protection, lax white-collar crime enforcement, underdeveloped (by Western standards) sexual harassment laws, and ambiguities in sex norms. Strict defamation laws are particularly important. Truth does not constitute a defense in Japan, and there is no requirement of malice or economic harm. Damage to honor suffices. As a result, public officials are fairly protected against moral attacks. But since damages awarded by courts are low, the press does not always mince its words; thus many scandals are played out in the form of defamation cases. The bifurcated structure of the Japanese media also has a bearing on scandal activity. Elite media constitute a closed world operating through exclusive press clubs, whose members tend to shy away from scandal both because of high-mindedness and because of their dependence on the elite of the nation. The weeklies and the television wide-shows, in contrast, revel in raunchy and irreverent coverage. For instance, the sex story about the adulterous relationship between Japanese Prime Minister Uno and a geisha was rebuffed by the elite press in 1989, but it was made public by a weekly. A particularly perspicuous chapter compares the pragmatics of public apology in Japan and United States. Among other things, West finds that individual apologies in Japan are often made for the benefit of groups and that they rarely adopt the trope of religious redemption, as is often the case in America. What is more, the apologizers are often chosen by the organization or group that the scandal implicates. The book takes on a good deal of common wisdom about Japan. We find, for instance, that the Japanese are fairly litigious. Japanese politicians and celebrities routinely have recourse to law to defend their honor. West reports that 741 defamation complaints were filed in Japan during 2004. …