Abstract
The aim of this article is to address the question: Why companies which produce or use pellets made from recycled plastics choose a strategic invisibility for their activities. The recycling of plastics is a process spread over an extended recycling supply chain. The negative stigma associated with recycled plastic in Indonesia is directed away from the factories towards the waste-pickers, junk-dealers and grinders who work the waste manually from which the recycled plastic is selected. Their remoteness from the source not only allows the factories to shake off the opprobrium of working with waste, they can also distance themselves from what goes on earlier in the supply chain. They are not held accountable for possible environmental or social mismanagement in the sorting of plastic waste. The factories, nevertheless, manage to maintain control over this supply chain by setting standards for the materials they accept. The factories have the power to declare which supplier is up to standard and which is not, and have the alternative of opting for virgin plastic made from mineral oil, which keeps prices of recycled plastic low. This conspicuous invisibility is convenient for all involved in the recycling industry in the short run, but more openness would be better for all sides.
Highlights
It was a long taxi ride to the fringes of the city of Surabaya (Indonesia) to find the factory which was, according to information found on the Internet, producing plastics from recycled waste
Jambeck et al (2015) estimate that 11% of the solid waste in Indonesia consists of plastics and this percentage is confirmed in two local studies in Surabaya (Kurniawan et al 2013: 45; Dhokhikah 2016) and another study found that the share of plastics in the waste deposited at the landfill was 7.7% (Meilasari 2013)
Pak Nordin produces large plastic objects, like water barrels, dust bins and kayaks, for which he always uses a mixture of plastics made from crude oil and recycled plastics. If he were to make the objects from new plastic only, the cost would be prohibitive but he is limited to a maximum of 50% of the cheaper recycled plastic, as this material is more inelastic and brittle
Summary
The negative stigma associated with recycled plastic in Indonesia is directed away from the factories towards the waste-pickers, junk-dealers and grinders who work the waste manually from which the recycled plastic is selected Their remoteness from the source allows the factories to shake off the opprobrium of working with waste, they can distance themselves from what goes on earlier in the supply chain. The factories have the power to declare which supplier is up to standard and which is not, and have the alternative of opting for virgin plastic made from mineral oil, which keeps prices of recycled plastic low This conspicuous invisibility is convenient for all involved in the recycling industry in the short run, but more openness would be better for all sides
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
