Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo delineate the mechanism behind insurance‐related disparities in the prenatal diagnosis of a congenital heart defect (CHD).MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of electronic health records of pregnant individuals whose infants received CHD surgery between 2019 and 2020 in the third‐largest United States metropolitan area. The outcome was whether a prenatal diagnosis was received. The exposure was the pregnant individual's insurance status. The mediator was second‐trimester ultrasound receipt. Control variables included sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the pregnant individual and infant. The relationships between exposure, mediator, and outcome were quantified using mediation analysis with multivariable fixed‐effects regression.ResultsIn total, 496 pregnant individuals met inclusion criteria; 215 (43.3%) were publicly insured and 305 (61.5%) had prenatal diagnosis. In bivariate regressions, public insurance was associated with a 12.6% lower probability (CI 3%–21%) of prenatal diagnosis. In multivariable models, public insurance was associated with 13.2% lower probability (CI 2%–25%) of second‐trimester ultrasound receipt but was no longer associated with prenatal diagnosis after adjusting for second‐trimester ultrasound receipt, suggesting a possible mediation effect. Mediation analysis confirmed that second‐trimester ultrasound receipt mediated 39% of the relationship between public insurance and prenatal diagnosis.ConclusionAn appreciable portion of insurance‐related differences in prenatal CHD diagnosis is due to the lower frequency of second‐trimester ultrasound receipt among those with public insurance.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.