Abstract

AbstractTo analyze the contribution of supramolecular interactions to helical architectures and to investigate whether ligand folding can be induced by only protons in a similar fashion in the absence of metal ions, a new 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen)‐based extended ligand, C12H6N2[CHNC6H4NH(C10H6N)]2 (L1), its copper(I) complexes, [Cu2(C12H6N2{CHNC6H4NH(C10H6N)}2)2] [PF6]2 (1), [Cu2(C12H6N2{CHNC6H4NH(C10H6N)}2)2][BF4]2 (2), [Cu2(C12H6N2{CHNC6H4NH(C10H6N)}2)2][CuCl2]2·CH2Cl2 (3), and [Cu4(C12H6N2{CHNC6H4NH(C10H6N)}2)2][Cu2I4] (4), were prepared and structurally characterized. Ligand L1 wraps copper(I) ions in two intriguingly different fashions depending on the nature of the anions. Although dicopper helicates 1–3 and tetracopper helicate 4 show significant intermolecular interactions that show considerable structural relationships with DNA, helicate 4 more closely resembles the structural features of DNA that even phen‐based stacking interactions are present between the two helical strands. In complex 4, the dinuclear [Cu2I4]2– dianion is involved in intermolecular interactions, which joins two cationic units in a linear fashion, whereas the monoanions in complexes 1–3 (i.e., PF6–, BF4–, and CuCl2–) are only involved in intramolecular interactions or connect the cations laterally. The anion‐dependent topology serves as a reminder that the helical topology of a cation can be altered by changing the nature of the anion.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.