Abstract
This study compared the secondary reinforcing properties of two cues distinguished on the basis of their prior significance in a brightness discrimination problem: a cue discriminative for reinforcement but not present in the goal region (a non-redundant predictor of reward) and a cue present in the goal region but irrelevant to the acquisition of the required discrimination (a redundant predictor or reward). The findings suggest that both cues were equally effective in reinforcing a simple position habit.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
