Abstract

Argon cluster ions have enabled molecular depth profiling to unprecedented depths, with minimal loss of chemical information or changes in sputter rate. However, depth profiling of ultrathick films (>100 μm) using a commercial ion source oriented at 45° to the surface causes the crater bottom to shrink in size because of a combination of the crater wall angle, sputter rate differences along the trailing‐edge crater wall, and undercutting on the leading‐edge. The shrinking of the crater bottom has 2 immediate effects on dual‐beam depth profiling: first is that the centering of the analysis beam inside the sputter crater will no longer ensure the best quality depth profile because the location of the flat crater bottom progressively shifts toward the leading‐edge and second, the shifting of the crater bottom enforces a maximum thickness of the film that could be depth profiled. Experiments demonstrate that a time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry instrument equipped with a 20 keV argon cluster source is limited to depth profiling a 180 μm‐thick film when a 500 μm sputter raster is used and a 100 μm square crater bottom is to be left for analysis. In addition, depth profiling of a multilayer film revealed that the depth resolution degrades on trailing‐edge side of the crater bottom presumably because of the redeposition of the sputtered flux from the crater wall onto the crater bottom.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call