Abstract

It is currently held that glyphosate efficiently controls the obligate holoparasite Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Egyptian broomrape) by inhibiting its endogenous shikimate pathway, thereby causing a deficiency in aromatic amino acids (AAA). While there is no argument regarding the shikimate pathway being the primary site of the herbicide's action, the fact that the parasite receives a constant supply of nutrients, including proteins and amino acids, from the host does not fit with an AAA deficiency. This apparent contradiction implies that glyphosate mechanism of action in P. aegyptiaca is probably more complex and does not end with the inhibition of the AAA biosynthetic pathway alone. A possible explanation would lie in a limitation of the translocation of solutes from the host as a secondary effect. We examined the following hypotheses: (a) glyphosate does not affects P. aegyptiaca during its independent phase and (b) glyphosate has a secondary effect on the ability of P. aegyptiaca to attract nutrients, limiting the translocation to the parasite. By using a glyphosate-resistant host plant expressing the “phloem-mobile” green fluorescent protein (GFP), it was shown that glyphosate interacts specifically with P. aegyptiaca, initiating a deceleration of GFP translocation to the parasite within 24 h of treatment. Additionally, changes in the entire sugars profile (together with that of other metabolites) of P. aegyptiaca were induced by glyphosate. In addition, glyphosate did not impair germination or seedling development of P. aegyptiaca but begun to exert its action only after the parasite has established a connection to the host vascular system and became exposed to the herbicide. Our findings thus indicate that glyphosate does indeed have a secondary effect in P. aegyptiaca, probably as a consequence of its primary target inhibition—via inhibition of the translocation of phloem-mobile solutes to the parasite, as was simulated by the mobile GFP. The observed disruption in the metabolism of major sugars that are abundant in P. aegyptiaca within 48 h after glyphosate treatment provides a possible explanation for this inhibition of translocation and might reflect a critical secondary effect of the herbicide's primary action that results in loss of the parasite's superior sink for solutes.

Highlights

  • The obligate holoparasite Egyptian broomrape, Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Orobanchaceae, formerly known as Orobanche aegyptiaca), parasitizes dicotyledonous plants and causes severe yield loss in numerous vegetable crops (Eizenberg et al, 2012, 2013)

  • Glyphosate Has No Effect on Germination and Seedling Development of P. aegyptiaca The fate of P. aegyptiaca seeds and seedlings exposed to glyphosate in the soil solution is not known, but it is relevant to the understanding whether glyphosate prevents success of this parasite during its independent stage of life

  • Holoparasites differ from autotrophic plants in that they depend on photosynthesis and carbon assimilation of another organism

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The obligate holoparasite Egyptian broomrape, Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Orobanchaceae, formerly known as Orobanche aegyptiaca), parasitizes dicotyledonous plants and causes severe yield loss in numerous vegetable crops (Eizenberg et al, 2012, 2013). The life cycle of P. aegyptiaca—like that of other members of the genus Phelipanche—can be roughly divided into two main phases (Joel, 2000): a short independent phase, starting from seed conditioning and continuing through germination to the establishment of a vascular connection to the host root, and a parasitic phase, which lasts throughout the rest of the parasite lifecycle. During the latter phase, the parasite depends entirely on the host plant for water, carbohydrates and nutrients (HeideJørgensen, 2013). Viral DNA and RNA were transferred from infected tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants to P. aegyptiaca (Gal-On et al, 2009), and movement of green fluorescent protein (GFP) was demonstrated between parasitized transgenic tomato plants, expressing GFP under the AtSUC2 promoter (Imlau et al, 1999), and P. aegyptiaca (Aly et al, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.