Abstract

<p class="apa">This paper analyzes the extension of the right to secondary education in Brazil. Currently, the debate on secondary education has been intensified in civil society highlighting the problem of the reason of its precarious offer, not to mention a significant proportion of young people and adults who have not finished this level of schooling. Opinions vary on how the offer to secondary education should be held: while a minority believes that schooling should be humanistic and scientific; others support integrated education with a technical certification. Others advocate the separation of secondary professional education. This myriad of projects and programs has invaded the educational systems and schools, a portrait of public action in the education area, divided between republicans and private interests, in the context of disputes between the process of democratization and modernization, guided by the excellence of the performance of the institutions and students. This paper has an essay character produced within the research ‘Innovative High School Program: working conditions and teacher education’ with CNPq funding and during the post-doctoral studies conducted at the École Normale Supèrieure de Lyon/France, with CAPES financial support.</p>

Highlights

  • Half a century ago, a profound expansion of schooling was processed in the capitalist countries, a process characterized by some scholars as an ‘education revolution’ (Esteve, 2006)

  • Besides the traditional difficulty of establishing a common educational project, dominated by the private education offer to the ruling class and a plurality of cultural models, segregating education policies deepen the individualization of education pathways. Within this framework of thought, this paper argues that the late process of democratization of Brazil and its education was questioned by the imperative logic of economic and cultural globalization, which founded certain aspects that highlighted the logic of effectiveness, efficiency, focus on achieving the right solution, optimization, priority in a favorable cost/benefit relation and progress

  • Even without the legal apparatus of the law, access to secondary education underwent strong growth over the period 1988-2007, with a growth rate of 219% (IPEA, 2009), a tendency mobilized by pressure of the increasing access to primary education and by the specific requirements of the work market experienced in the 1990s

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A profound expansion of schooling (and its consequent massification) was processed in the capitalist countries, a process characterized by some scholars as an ‘education revolution’ (Esteve, 2006). Besides the traditional difficulty of establishing a common educational project, dominated by the private education offer to the ruling class and a plurality of cultural models, segregating education policies deepen the individualization of education pathways Within this framework of thought, this paper argues that the late process of democratization of Brazil and its education was questioned by the imperative logic of economic and cultural globalization (recognized as modernization), which founded certain aspects that highlighted the logic of effectiveness, efficiency, focus on achieving the right solution, optimization, priority in a favorable cost/benefit relation and progress. This practice causes limitations in the development of the democratic management experience of the last 25 years of public education

Situating the Debate on Education Policies
The Right to Schooling in Secondary Education and Its Limits
The Provision of Secondary Education in Brazil and Its Paradoxes
Findings
Final Considerations

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.