Abstract

Abstract Buoyant shear layers are encountered in many engineering and environmental applications, and have been studied by researchers in the context of experiments and modeling for decades. Often, these flows have high Reynolds and Richardson numbers, and this leads to significant/intractable space-time resolution requirements for DNS or LES modeling. On the other hand, many of the important physical mechanisms in these systems, such as stress anisotropy, wake stabilization, and regime transition, inherently render eddy viscosity-based RANS modeling inappropriate. Accordingly, we pursue second-moment closure (SMC), i.e., full Reynolds stress/flux/variance modeling, for moderate Reynolds number non-stratified, and stratified shear layers for which DNS is possible. A range of sub-model complexity is pursued for the diffusion of stresses, density fluxes and variance, pressure strain and scrambling, and dissipation. These sub-models are evaluated in terms of how well they are represented by DNS in comparison to the exact Reynolds averaged terms, and how well they impact the accuracy of the full RANS closure. For the non-stratified case, the SMC model predicts the shear layer growth rate and Reynolds shear stress profiles accurately. Stress anisotropy and budgets are captured only qualitatively. Comparing DNS of exact and modeled terms, inconsistencies in model performance and assumptions are observed, including inaccurate prediction of individual statistics, non-negligible pressure diffusion, and dissipation anisotropy. For the stratified case, shear layer and gradient Richardson number growth rates, and stress, flux and variance decay rates, are captured with less accuracy than corresponding flow parameters in the non-stratified case. These studies lead to several recommendations for model improvement.

Highlights

  • IntroductionMany researchers have studied stratification in homogeneous flows, and these studies have led to a community focus on salient physics and flow parameters that characterize these complex turbulent systems.Numerical analysis focusing on 2D stratified mixing layers have been performed in [1,2,3], including flows with initially turbulent perturbations [4]

  • Wake flows differ markedly in stratified compared to non-stratified environments

  • Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) based Eddy Viscosity Models (EVMs) are inherently incapable of accommodating the physics of stratified flow where the stratification is of importance due to underlying stress anisotropy and attendant wake stabilization and regime transition, at high Richardson numbers [5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many researchers have studied stratification in homogeneous flows, and these studies have led to a community focus on salient physics and flow parameters that characterize these complex turbulent systems.Numerical analysis focusing on 2D stratified mixing layers have been performed in [1,2,3], including flows with initially turbulent perturbations [4]. These turbulence resolving Direct Numerical Simulations (DNSs) and Large Eddy Simulations (LESs) require significant computational resources at the higher Reynolds and Richardson numbers observed in many practical applications. Significant increases in available computational resources have allowed for adequate mesh density for 3D applications, leading to stable, practical and robust applications of SMC methods [7, 8]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call