Abstract

FOLFIRINOX (FX) and gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) have been reported as effective regimens for unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). FX may be more effective but is also associated with more adverse events (AEs). Therefore, first-line treatment with FX followed by second-line GnP may be appropriate. Aims: To assess the safety and efficacy of second-line GnP for patients with APC after first-line FX failure. Methods: This study was a multicenter prospective phase II study evaluating second-line GnP in patients with APC after failed first-line FX. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and the frequency and degree of adverse events (AEs). Results: Thirty patients (14 male; median age, 64 years) were enrolled. The RR was 13.3%, with a median follow-up time of 9.3 months. The median OS and PFS were 7.6 and 3.8 months, respectively. From the beginning of first-line treatment, the median OS and PFS were 14.2 and 9.3 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 AEs were seen in 70% of patients. Conclusion: Second-line GnP after FX failure for patients with APC could be more effective than GEM alone. Further comparison studies are warranted.

Highlights

  • Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death, with more than 330,000 deaths worldwide annually [1]

  • The development of an effective and tolerable chemotherapy regimen is crucial for improving the outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC)

  • From the initiation of the first-line treatment, the median overall survival (OS) was 14.2 months

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death, with more than 330,000 deaths worldwide annually [1]. The development of an effective and tolerable chemotherapy regimen is crucial for improving the outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). According to the phase III studies of FX and GnP [3,4], the OS, PFS, and RR are slightly better with FX. Considering these points, one possible strategy for APC treatment could involve first-line FX followed by second-line GnP. To evaluate this strategy, we conducted a multi-center prospective phase-II study of second-line GnP for patients with APC after FX treatment failure

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call