Abstract
We analyze the interaction between high workload of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff and the information production stimulated by their review process of initial public offerings (IPOs). We find that high workload is associated with more general comments in the first letter, with fewer overall comments for later letters, and that the SEC answers quicker while being busy. Using a measure of initial SEC concerns based on comment counts, we reinforce the empirical evidence on the relationship between the IPO filing review and (downward) offer price revisions. However, this correlation disappears for IPOs, where the filing review is conducted under a high workload. Consistent with theories on investor compensation and information asymmetry, we find underpricing to be significantly larger for these IPOs.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
