Abstract

This paper gauges the importance of market timing for the decision to conduct a seasoned equity offering by testing whether SEO decisions are better explained by timing opportunities or by a simple fundamentals-based theory in which firms sell stock primarily in the early stages of their lifecycle, when growth opportunities exceed internally generated cash flow. We measure timing opportunities using market-to-book ratios and prior and future stock returns (and other equity mispricing proxies advanced in the literature), and lifecycle stage by the number of years listed. Both timing and lifecycle proxies have a significant influence, with the lifecycle effect quantitatively stronger, but neither adequately explains SEO decisions because (i) a near-majority of issuers are not growth firms, and (ii) the vast majority of firms with high M/B ratios and high recent and poor future stock returns fail to issue stock. Since a full 62.6% of issuers would run out of cash by the year after the SEO without the offer proceeds (and 81.1% would have subnormal cash balances at that time), we conclude that a near-term cash need is the primary SEO motive, with market-timing opportunities and lifecycle stage exerting economically significant ancillary influences on the SEO decision.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.