Abstract

We studied the larger (>1000 µm) size fraction of zooplankton in an Arctic coastal water community in Billefjorden, Svalbard (78°40' N), Norway, in order to describe seasonal ver- tical distributions of the dominant taxa in relation to environmental variability. Calanus spp. numerically dominated the herbivores; Aglantha digitale, Mertensia ovum, Beroe cucumis, and Parasagitta elegans were the dominant carnivores. Omnivores and detritivores were numerically less important. Descent to deeper regions of the water column (>100 m) between August and October, and ascent to the shallower region (<100 m) between November and May was the overall seasonal pattern in this zooplankton community. In contrast to other groups, P. elegans did not exhibit pronounced vertical migrations. Seasonal vertical distributions of most species showed statistical associations with the availability of their main food source. The vertical distribution of later developmental stages of Calanus spp. was inversely associated with fluorescence, indicating that they descended from the shallower region while it was still relatively productive, and ascended before the primary production had started to increase. Strong associations between the vertical distributions of secondary consumer M. ovum and Calanus spp., and tertiary consumer B. cucumis and M. ovum indicated that these carnivores seasonally followed their prey through the water column. We conclude that seasonal vertical migrations are a widespread trait in the high Arctic community studied, and predatorprey interactions seem particularly central in shaping the associations between the seasonal vertical strategies of adjacent trophic levels.

Highlights

  • Pronounced seasonal oscillations in abiotic and biotic environments offer challenges to zooplankton in high latitudes

  • We studied the extent to which the seasonal vertical distributions of the above zooplankton could be explained by the seasonal dynamics of their primary food source, or physical environmental variables such as temperature, salinity, and irradiance

  • The Prosome lengths (PL) boundaries derived from the length–frequency analysis of Calanus spp. (Table 3) were in accordance with those published for C. finmarchicus and C. glacialis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pronounced seasonal oscillations in abiotic (e.g. solar radiation, temperature, sea ice) and biotic (e.g. food availability, predation pressure) environments offer challenges to zooplankton in high latitudes. Seasonality in food availability is believed to be a significant challenge (Clarke & Peck 1991, Conover & Huntley 1991, Hagen 1999, Varpe 2012). The underlying regulation of zooplankton seasonal vertical strategies has been a subject of interest since early 1900s (Russell 1927, Banse 1964). Seasonal variability in hydrography (Hirche 1991), photoperiod (Sømme 1934, Miller et al 1991), and visual predation (Kaartvedt 1996, Dale et al 1999, Kaartvedt 2000) are some external environmental cues that are thought to regulate seasonal vertical strategies. Internal (endogenous) regulation through seasonal changes in gonad development (Østvedt 1955), lipids and buoyancy (Visser & Jónasdóttir 1999), and long-term endogenous timers (Miller et al 1991, Hirche 1996) have been suggested

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call