Seasonal variation in the effect of antihypertensive treatment with the irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination.

Abstract

There is increasing awareness of seasonal variation in blood pressure (BP). In the present analysis, we investigated seasonal variation in the antihypertensive treatment effect of the irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in patients with stage 2 and 3 hypertension. The study participants were hypertensive patients enrolled in a 12-week therapeutic study. Antihypertensive treatment was initiated with irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide 150/12.5 mg/day, with possible uptitration to 300/12.5 mg/day and 300/25 mg/day at 4 and 8 weeks of follow-up, respectively. The month of treatment commencement was classified as spring/summer (May to August) and autumn/winter (September to December). Of the 501 enrolled patients, 313 and 188 commenced antihypertensive treatment in spring/summer and autumn/winter, respectively. The mean changes in systolic/diastolic BP at 8 and 12 weeks of follow-up were greater in patients who commenced treatment in autumn/winter (-32.3/-16.5 and -34.2/-16.7 mmHg, respectively) than those who commenced treatment in spring/summer (-28.4/-13.9 and -27.1/-12.8 mmHg, respectively), with a between-season difference of 3.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-6.4, P = 0.002)/2.6 (95% CI, 0.9-4.2, P = 0.002) mmHg and 7.0 (95% CI, 4.7-9.3, P < 0.0001)/3.9 (95% CI, 2.4-5.4, P < 0.0001) mmHg, respectively. Further subgroup analyses according to several baseline characteristics showed a greater between-season difference in the changes in systolic BP in patients aged ≥55 years than in those <55 years (n = 255, 12.6 mmHg vs. n = 246, 6.9 mmHg, P = 0.02), especially in patients who did not use antihypertensive medication at baseline (n = 94, 15.4 mmHg vs. n = 132, 5.4 mmHg, P = 0.006). In conclusion, there is indeed seasonality in the antihypertensive treatment effect, with a greater BP reduction in patients who commenced treatment in cold than warm seasons.