Abstract

AbstractIn the western Serengeti of Tanzania, African elephant Loxodonta africana populations are increasing, which is rare across the species’ range. Here, conservation objectives come into conflict with competing interests such as agriculture. Elephants regularly damage crops, which threatens livelihoods and undermines local support for conservation. For damage reduction efforts to be successful, limited resources must be used efficiently and strategies for mitigation and prevention should be informed by an understanding of the spatial and temporal distribution of crop damage. We assessed historical records of crop damage by elephants to describe the dynamics and context of damage in the western Serengeti. We used binary data and generalized additive models to predict the probability of crop damage at the village level in relation to landscape features and metrics of human disturbance. During 2012–2014 there were 3,380 reports of crop damage by elephants submitted to authorities in 42 villages. Damage was concentrated in villages adjacent to a reserve boundary and peaked during periods of crop maturity and harvest. The village-level probability of crop damage was negatively associated with distance from a reserve, positively with length of the boundary shared with a reserve, and peaked at moderate levels of indicators of human presence. Spatially aggregated historical records can provide protected area managers and regional government agencies with important insights into the distribution of conflict across the landscape and between seasons, and can guide efforts to optimize resource allocation and future land use planning efforts.

Highlights

  • Protected areas are widely recognized for their critical role in conserving biodiversity in situ

  • Conservation conflicts develop when conservation objectives compete with other interests, or when people are affected by species of conservation priority (Redpath et al, ; Redpath et al, )

  • We examine the influence of land use on the risk of crop damage at the village level, and comment on potential implications for land-use planning efforts that aim to reduce negative interactions between people and wildlife

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Protected areas are widely recognized for their critical role in conserving biodiversity in situ They can benefit neighbouring communities, but living in close proximity to reserves and the wildlife they protect incurs costs. Wildlife can have an impact on people by damaging assets (crops, livestock, structures), causing physical injury or death, and creating fear and restrictions to movement People affected in this way are more likely to harbour negative attitudes towards conservation efforts, support the abolishment of protected areas and the use of lethal control, and use impacts as an excuse for poaching (Newmark et al, ; De Boer & Baquete, ; Hill, ; Madden, ; Malima et al, ; Mbaiwa et al, , Sebotho & Toteng, )

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.