Abstract

Natural language dialogue is a desirable method for human-robot interaction and human-computer interaction. Critical to the success of dialogue is the underlying model for common ground and the grounding process that establishes, adds to, and repairs shared understanding. The model of grounding for human-computer interaction should be informed by human-human dialogue. However, the processes involved in human-human grounding are under dispute within the research community. Three models have been proposed: alignment, a simple model that has been influential on dialogue system development, interpersonal synergy, an automatic coordination emerging from interaction, and perspective taking, a strategic interaction based on intentional coordination. Few studies have simultaneously evaluated these models. We tested the models’ ability to account for human-human performance in a complex collaborative task that stressed the grounding process. The results supported the perspective taking model over the synergy model and the alignment model, indicating the need to reassess the alignment model as a foundation for human-computer interaction.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.