Abstract

Although many risk studies investigate perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors, the causal relationships among them have not yet been verified. Thus, further investigations of these relationships are necessary. This study analyzes three causal models consisting of three components: perceptions (i.e., perceived risk in this study), attitudes (i.e., satisfaction), and behavior (i.e., support for policy). This study checks these relationships in the context of nuclear energy policy. Using a hierarchical regression model, this study tests three different models between the three components: (1) Model 1 (a high-involvement model), (2) Model 2 (a low-involvement model), and (3) Model 3 (a hedonic model). First, in the high-involvement model, behavior is affected by perceptions and attitudes. In particular, attitudes mediate the relationship between risk perceptions and satisfaction. Second, in the low-involvement model, attitudes indirectly affect perceptions through behaviors. Third, in the hedonic model, behaviors affect attitudes, and risk perceptions do not mediate that relationship. This causal model does not depend on perceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of nuclear power. Our analysis shows that Model 1 is fully significant, and Model 2 and 3 are only partially significant.

Highlights

  • In Japan, after the Fukushima nuclear accident occurred in March 2011, the public’s acceptance of nuclear power energy decreased, and perceptions of trust in nuclear policy have become more negative [1]

  • This study employs the hierarchical regression model (HRM) to test the relative influences of individual-level factors on three components

  • We find that behavior has a full mediating effect in the low-involvement model and in the hedonic model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Japan, after the Fukushima nuclear accident occurred in March 2011, the public’s acceptance of nuclear power energy decreased, and perceptions of trust in nuclear policy have become more negative [1]. Gaps in the level of perceived risk still remain according people’s perceptions, attitudes, and behaviors [2]. Previous studies have considered many variables that may influence risk perceptions (cognition) regarding nuclear energy policy and satisfaction (attitudes) and compliance (behavior) with such policies [3,4,5]. The central question in this study is how to acquire mediation tools for solving social conflicts. Such tools can enable citizens to use their collective intelligence, learn from each other, and prepare them to identify their own perspectives on the riskiness of nuclear power

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.