Searching for green elephants and other mythical creatures during the Trump years: Partisanship and congressional voting on environmental legislation

Abstract

AbstractAre there any environmentalists left in the Republican Party? Using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and data from the League of Conservation Voters (LCV) for the 115th (2017–2018) and 116th (2019–2020) Congresses, the author finds that around 25% of Republicans in the House of Representatives and 40% of those in the Senate are more supportive of environmental legislation than the average Democrat in their respective chambers, when separating partisanship from environmentalism. However, findings also suggest that environmentalism for Republicans tends to focus far more on conserving existing programs and resources than it does on advocating for progressive new policies to address emerging problems, like climate change, so it manifests differently than environmentally focused initiatives that are synonymous with the policy doctrine of Democrats.Related ArticlesDunning, Kelly Heber. 2021. “Unlikely Conservation Policy Making in a Polarized Congress: A Multiple Streams Analysis of ‘America's Most Successful Conservation Program’.” Politics & Policy 50(1): 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12448.Gershtenson, Joseph, Brian W. Smith, and William R. Mangun. 2006. “Friends of the Earth? Partisanship, Party Control of Congress, and Environmental Legislation in Congress.” Politics & Policy 34(1): 66–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2006.00004.x.Wink, Kenneth A., and Andrew Bargen. 2008. “The Consolidation of the White Southern Congressional Vote: The Roles of Ideology and Party Identification.” Politics & Policy 36(3): 376–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2007.00113.x.