Abstract
Experiments have shown that relaxation of oil/water interfacial tension by adsorption of alkyl ethoxylate surfactants from water onto an oil droplet is delayed relative to diffusion-controlled adsorption. We examine possible causes of this delay, and we show that several are implausible. We find that redissolution of the surfactant in the oil droplet cannot explain the apparent interfacial resistance at short times because the interface will preferentially fill before any such redissolution occurs. We also perform umbrella sampling with molecular dynamics simulation and do not find any evidence of a free-energy barrier or low-diffusivity zone near the interface. Nor do we find evidence from the simulation that premicellar aggregation slows diffusion enough to cause the observed resistance to interfacial adsorption. We are therefore unable to pinpoint the cause of the resistance, but we suggest that "dead time" associated with the experimental method could be responsible-specifically a local depletion of surfactant by the ejected droplet when creating the fresh interface between the oil and water.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
