Abstract
Students in upper secondary education encounter difficulties in applying mathematics in physics. To improve our understanding of these difficulties, we examined symbol sense behavior of six grade 10 physics students solving algebraic physic problems. Our data confirmed that students did indeed struggle to apply algebra to physics, mainly because they lacked both sufficient symbol sense behavior and basic algebraic skills. They used ad hoc strategies instead of correct, systematic rule-based procedures involving insight. These ad hoc strategies included the cross-multiplication, the numbering, and the permutation strategy. They worked only for basic formulas containing few variables. In problems with more variables, students got stuck. The latter two strategies substitute numbers for variables. The permutation strategy randomly checks several permutations to guess which one is correct. The numbering strategy substitutes numbers to check algebraic manipulations. Our results indicate insufficient focus on conceptual understanding of algebra in some mathematics textbooks, leading to reliance on poorly understood ad hoc strategies. Effective teaching of algebraic skills should not focus on either basic algebraic skills or on symbol sense behavior. Instead, both aspects should be taught in an integrated manner. Our operationalization of symbol sense behavior turned out to be very useful for analysis. In contrast to earlier qualitative studies, it provided us the opportunity to measure symbol sense behavior quantitatively. This operationalization should also be applicable to other science subjects. Furthermore, we discussed some implications of our results for curricula, teachers, science teacher educators, and textbook publishers aiming at successful application of mathematics in physics.
Highlights
Mathematics plays a major role in science education (Karam 2014; Roorda et al 2015)
Each students’ work was analyzed in detail, we only present the results of Diana, Eve, and Chloe, because their combination of sense behavior (SSB) (%), OBAS (%), OSSB (%), and problemsolving strategies varied a lot
The main difference with previous studies (e.g., Bokhove 2011; Drijvers 2015) is that these tasks contain expressions with variables relating to real, measurable physical quantities, and other studies to abstract mathematical variables without meaning in real life
Summary
Research has shown that students face difficulties when applying mathematics in science subjects (e.g., Quinn 2013; Redish and Kuo 2014). Such struggles can be persistent and concern students of all ages. In the first year of USE, grade 10 students who follow physics have to choose between mathematics A and mathematics B The latter puts more emphasis on algebra than the former. The content of these subjects is described in national curricula (Netherlands institute for curriculum development 2016). These curricula contain both the general educational core goals and the more specific standards, which are tested in national final examinations
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.