Abstract
It has been known that $B \rightarrow D^{(*)} \tau \nu_{\tau}$ are good observables in the search for the charged Higgs. The recent obervation of deviation from standard-model by almost 4$\sigma$ by Babar, Belle and LHCb in $R(D^{(*)})$ revived the interest in possible signal of presence of charged Higgs in these modes. But such a large deviation in the rates, where standard-model has tree level contribution, coming from a charged Higgs alone is highly unlikely. However these decay modes are good probes to search for small charged Higgs signal if we can construct sensitive observables in these modes. In this work we would like to propose four new observables which shows much more sensitivity to the presence of charged Higgs than the usual observables such as $A_{\lambda}^{D^{(*)}}$ and $A_{\theta}^{D^{(*)}}$. These four observable are (1) $\frac{1}{A_{\lambda}^{D}}$, (2) $Y_{1}(q^{2}) = \frac{A^{D}_{\theta}}{A^{D}_{\lambda}}$, (3) $Y_{2}(q^{2}) = \frac{d\Gamma(B \rightarrow D^{*}\tau\nu_{\tau})}{d\Gamma_{D}(\lambda_{\tau}=+1/2) - d\Gamma_{D}(\lambda_{\tau}=-1/2)}$ and (4) $Y_{3}(q^{2}) = (\frac{q^{2}}{m^{2}_{\tau}})(A^{D}_{\lambda} + 1)\frac{1}{A^{D}_{\lambda}}$.
Highlights
The LHC discovery of a scalar behaving like the standardmodel (SM) Higgs boson [1] marks the tentative experimental completion of SM with all the particles it predicted observed experimentally
It is pretty evident that we require new-physics (NP) at some scale above about
We have given four new observables which are very sensitive to the presence of charged scalars in the B → D(∗)τντ decays
Summary
The LHC discovery of a scalar behaving like the standardmodel (SM) Higgs boson [1] marks the tentative experimental completion of SM with all the particles it predicted observed experimentally. In following help us in ruling out all the models of new scalar parsections, we will give a general model-independent analysis of ticles whose effective coupling are non-negative for the most possible contribution from charged scalar to these deviations parts of the parameter space where NP part is less than the SM and observables sensitive to their presence. We will assume the scenario where future measurements in these modes finds that deviations in R(D(∗)) remains but no comparable deviations are found in the observables X2D(∗) (q2), a clear sign of presence of scalar type NP. Besides R(D)(q2) and R(D∗)(q2), we can define many more observables that are sensitive to the presence of new charged scalar particles in the B → D(∗)τντ decay distributions One such observable is tau spin asymmetry (AτD(∗) ) which is already defined in Eqs.(4) and Eqs.(5) of section 3.1. AτD(∗) do not give independent information, as they can be expressed in terms of each other using X1D(∗) and X2D(∗) , and so only AθD(∗) are independent constrains in the complex planes [22]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.