Abstract

During hydraulic fracturing operations of low-permeability reservoirs, packers are the key component to ensure the success of multistage fracturing. Packers enable sections of the wellbore to be sealed off and separately fractured by hydraulic pressure, one at a time, while the remainder of the wellbore is not affected. However, reliable sealing properties of the packer rubber are required to meet the high-pressure and high-temperature (HPHT) conditions of reservoirs (such as 70 MPa and 170 °C). In this study, the structures of the packer rubber with two different materials are optimized numerically by ABAQUS and validated by experiments. The optimization process starts from the packer rubber with a conventional structure, and then, the weakest spots are identified by ABAQUS and improved by slightly varying its structure. This process is iterative, and the final optimized structure of a single rubber barrel with expanding back-up rings is achieved. For the structure of three rubber barrels with metallic protective covers, both HNBR and AFLAS fail under HPHT conditions. For the final optimized structure, the packer rubber made of AFLAS can work better under HPHT than that made of HNBR which ruptures after setting. The results show that the optimized structure of a single rubber barrel with expanding back-up rings and the material AFLAS are a good combination for the packer rubber playing an excellent sealing performance in multistage fracturing in horizontal wells.

Highlights

  • At present, many oil fields in China have come into the middle and late stages of production

  • The results show that the conventional structure of three rubber barrels has poor sealing properties, which does not fit the conditions of high temperature and high pressure

  • The results show that the AFLAS rubber can work at a high temperature (170 °C); the composite construction of three rubber barrels which looks like tomatoes on sticks cannot meet the sealing requirements under high pressure and needs to be improved further

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many oil fields in China have come into the middle and late stages of production. Zhu et al (2017) made comparisons on the mechanical performances and morphology of three kinds of rubber materials (NBR, HNBR and FKM) before and after corrosion experiments, and the results showed that the tensile properties decreased significantly and the hardness reduced after corrosion. He et al (2016) investigated hydrogenated nitrile–butadiene rubber (HNBR) with a Rubber Processing Analyzer RPA2000 and conducted stress–strain tests in both elongation and compression modes. Rubber sleeves are installed on a packer and a function test scheme of the packer is designed which can simulate the packer setting and its working conditions

Selection of the rubber materials
Calculation of the packer setting force
Calculation of the average contact pressure
Conventional structure
Structure optimization plan 1: adding protective covers on both ends
Structure optimization plan 2
35 Protective Top
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.