Abstract

Implant–abutment connection (IAC) is a key factor for the long-term success and stability of implant-supported prosthodontic restoration and its surrounding tissues. Misfit between prosthodontic abutment and implant at the IAC leads to technical and biological complications. Two kinds of prosthodontic abutments are currently available on the market: original and third-party abutments. The aim of this pilot study was to test and compare the internal fit (gap) at the implant–abutment interface depending on the abutment fabrication method based on microbial leakage in static conditions and the need for the use of gap sealing material. Two groups of 40 implants were formed on the basis of the type of abutment. In each of the groups of two implant systems, two subgroups of 10 implants were formed. The tested subgroups consisted of 10 implants with sealing material and a negative control subgroups consisting of 10 implants without any sealing material. The test material, GapSeal (Hager and Werken, Duisburg, Germany) was applied in the test subgroups. The implant–abutment assemblies were contaminated with a solution containing Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans for 14 days under aerobic conditions. Results showed that there was no statistically significant difference regarding the microbial leakage between the original and third-party custom-made abutments, regardless of the use of sealing material. It can be concluded that the abutment fabrication method has no significant influence on sealing efficacy regarding the bacterial and fungal leakage in static conditions.

Highlights

  • Implant-prosthodontic therapy is an established treatment modality in dental practice that provides high success rates [1]

  • The most common and highly researched biological complication is peri-implantitis, which is influenced by plaque accumulation at the level of the Implant–abutment connection (IAC) [4]

  • Even though there is no evidence of complete prevention of miocrobial infiltration through the IAC, there are constant efforts to achieve a tight connection between prosthodontic abutment and implant fixture [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Implant-prosthodontic therapy is an established treatment modality in dental practice that provides high success rates [1]. Implant–abutment connection (IAC) is recognized as a crucial factor for the long-term success and stability of implant-supported prosthodontic restoration and its surrounding tissues, with emphasis on benefits of original abutments [2]. Misfit between such components presents a significant concern because it may lead to mechanical and biological complications [3]. Given the vast possibilities for combinations of variables in implant-prosthodontic rehabilitation, the abutment fabrication method should be carefully evaluated Regarding these facts, there are materials on the market that are declared to seal the gap at the IAC in order to eliminate microleakage, reducing or eliminating biological complications [9]. Considering the given information, it should provide long-term protection, avoiding auto- and re-infections by possible microbial accumulation at the IAC [10]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call