Abstract
This essay analyzes legal responses to the biodiversity threats posed by sea level rise. It focuses on implementation of the Endangered Species Act by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service. The essay begins by explaining the ways sea level rise threatens biodiversity, and then explains the legal tools the ESA offers as potential responses to those threats. It then examines how the FWS and NMFS have used, or not used, those tools. It finds that the agencies, while clearly cognizant of the threats posed by sea level rise, have avoided regulatory responses and instead have chosen to emphasize education and persuasion. That choice reflects the agencies’ awareness that none of the ESA’s regulatory tools is particularly well suited to address sea level rise, and that invoking any of those tools would generate political controversies and potential anti-regulatory backlashes. Nevertheless, the essay argues that such a non-regulatory approach holds slim odds of either mitigating the underlying causes of sea level rise or facilitating meaningful adaptation. It concludes with several suggestions for modest reforms, each of which would incrementally ameliorate the threats sea level rise poses for biodiversity. But it also argues that a truly meaningful response will require addressing the underlying causes of climate change.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.