Abstract
The ICESat-2 (IS2) ATL07 sea ice height product provides precise and accurate measurements of sea ice height for the polar regions. Although the original ATL07 product classifies the sea ice surface into snow-covered ice and open water (dark leads and specular leads), it has two critical issues: (1) it does not distinguish thin ice (gray ice) from thick/snow-covered ice or open water and (2) it involves uncertainties in the dark lead determination. To address these issues and obtain more accurate lead fraction and freeboard estimation, in this study, we assess a data-driven machine learning approach for sea ice surface type classification from the ATL07 product. A total of 17 IS2 tracks covering the Ross Sea in February, March, September, October, and November 2019 are used in this study. For training and testing the neural network (NN) models, we label the ATL07 data into three surface types: thick/snow-covered sea ice, thin/gray sea ice, and open water based on the coincident Sentinel-2 optical images. We use six variables from the ATL07 data: background rate, photon rate, relative surface height, width of height distribution, number of laser pulses, and difference in mean and median height, with the first three variables found to be the most significant in determining surface types. Our spatiotemporal test shows that the NN models can be applied to the ATL07 dataset with ∼99% accuracy in the Ross Sea, and the beam test shows that the difference in the accuracy for three beams is negligible. While the current ATL07 product captures only ∼5% of thin ice and ∼ 81% of open water correctly, our NN models capture ∼90% of both open water and thin ice leads successfully. When we qualitatively assess the surface classification of the NN models by using the coincident optical and radar images, our NN models do not show significant misclassification issues both in the daytime and nighttime and both in the winter and summer seasons. Compared to the IS2 ATL10 sea ice freeboard product, the ability of our NN model to separate thin ice and open water from snow-covered/thick ice is significant in freeboard estimation, especially for winter and highly packed sea ice areas. Open water and thin ice classes also improve mapping lead fraction and floe size distribution.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.