Abstract
SummaryThe ECJ states in its decision of 27 March 2014 (C-322/13) that the non-discrimination principle (article 18 TFEU) and the principle of free movement of persons (article 21 TFEU) preclude a rule of national law granting a right to use a language other than the official language of the Member State in civil proceedings brought before the courts of a Member State which are situated in a specific territorial entity, only to citizens of that State who are domiciled in the same territorial entity. The case note demonstrates that this ruling is a result of a very broad interpretation of the two principles in question.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
