Abstract

Abstract. Spatial quality assessment is based on the conformance of data to its specifications or fitness for users’ purpose. These specifications and the users’ purposes include the rules and constraints that a dataset should comply with. Assessing the compliance of data to the rules is still an active research subject and rule-based approach is the common method. For the efficient rule-based system implementation, it is desired to automate assessment process with a domain-independent and web-based approach. Reasoning capability and re-usability of semantic web components are expected to promote efficient implementation. In literature, many domains such as agriculture, music, Linked Data and geospatial domain etc. apply ontology-based methods for quality management. There is a need to model geospatial quality concepts and rules in a domain-independent way to automate the quality management process. In our model of rule formalism, we use Web Ontology Language (OWL) and Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL). We devise two types of ontologies. These are; the specification ontologies (SfO) and the Spatial Data Quality Ontology (SDQO). SfO is to be created by domain experts/users to define rules according to specifications. SDQO is responsible with quality assessment; it is domain independent and makes assessment based on the rules defined by any SfO for the related domain. The quality elements are domain and toposemantic consistency that assessed by SWRL. In this paper, the design considerations of the ontologies for quality assessment are explained with an example.

Highlights

  • High quality spatial data is essential in providing better analyses and making better decisions involving such data

  • Two generic classes are created in the specification ontologies (SfO); they are set as subclasses of the relevant classes in Spatial Data Quality Ontology (SDQO)

  • The aim of this study was to create ontologies that can be used for spatial data quality assessment process

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

High quality spatial data is essential in providing better analyses and making better decisions involving such data. Varadharajulu et al (2017) design a framework to check the consistency of the transportation data against the rules that are created with SWRL In these studies, SWRL rules are used with a domain dependent quality management framework. Besides the previously explained studies, Nash et al (2011) design a framework for the automatization of specification rules in agriculture domain with implementation of geospatial rules as Interchangeable Rule Format (RIF) and proposes, GeoRIF. The ontology they devised is specific to the agriculture regulations. Following sections describe SDQO and SfO and briefly explain how to use them for quality assessment with an example rule

Ontology Design
Motivating Scenarios and Questions
Geospatial Ontologies
SDQO and SfO relation
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call