Abstract

Eighty-one patients with advanced breast cancer completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) to determine how well these questionnaires identified patients suffering from an anxiety state or depressive illness, compared with an independent interview by a psychiatrist who used the Clinical Interview Schedule. A threshold score was defined for each questionnaire which gave the optimal sensitivity and specificity. Seventy-five per cent of patients were correctly identified as suffering from an affective disorder by both the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist and by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Twenty-one per cent of 'normal' patients were misclassified by the Rotterdam Checklist and 26% by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. When the HADs anxiety and depression subscales were analysed separately, the performance of the anxiety items was superior to that of the depression items. Both questionnaires were found to have good predictive value and could be used in patients with advanced cancer to help screen out those with an affective disorder.

Highlights

  • Psychiatric morbidity Twenty (25%) patients were found at interview to have a depressive illness and/or anxiety state while 11 (14%) patients had a borderline mood disorder

  • Performance of the two questionnaires in the study sample The sensitivity and specificity were calculated for the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety and depression subscales and the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) psychological complaints subscale, using both the recommended threshold score (11) and a range of alternative cut-off scores

  • Specificity indicates the proportion of correctly identified non-cases and the false positive rate (1-specificity)

Read more

Summary

Methods

Patients with advanced cancer of the breast attending medical oncology outpatient clinics over a 12 month period were included, providing they were free from dementia or cerebral metastases. A research nurse explained the study and asked each patient to complete the two questionnaires. The HADS is designed to discriminate between anxiety and depression and is made up of a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depression subscale. Each item (for example, 'I can laugh and see the funny side of things') is rated on a 4-point scale (e.g. as much as-I always do (0); not quite so much (1); definitely not so much (2); and not at all (3), giving maximum subscale scores of 21 for depression and anxiety respectively. The authors of the HADS suggested that scores > 11 on either subscale were indicative of a case of depression or a case of clinical anxiety, whilst subscale scores in the 8-10 range represented borderline cases

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call