Abstract

The Canadian Arctic is receiving increased ship traffic, largely related to non-renewable resource exploitation and facilitated by climate change. This traffic, much of which arrives in ballast, increases opportunities for the spread of aquatic invasive species (AIS). One of the regions at greatest risk is the Hudson Bay Complex. A horizon scanning exercise was conducted using the semi-quantitative Canadian Marine Invasive Screening Tool (CMIST) to identify AIS of potential concern to the region. This screening-level risk assessment tool, uses documented information to answer questions related to the likelihood and impact of invasion. Species were analyzed by ecological categories (zoobenthos, zooplankton, phytobenthos) and taxonomic groups, with 14 species (out of 31) identified as being of highest relative risk. Crabs, mollusks, macrozooplankton and macroalgae were the taxonomic groups with the highest overall risk scores, through a combination of higher likelihood of invasion and impact scores relative to other taxa. Species that may pose the highest AIS risk are currently mainly distributed on the east and west coasts of the North Atlantic Ocean. Their distributions coincide with source ports and shipping pathways that are well connected to the Hudson Bay Complex. This first horizon scan to identify potential high-risk AIS for the Canadian Arctic incorporated two novel approaches into the CMIST analysis: i) use of the tool to assess two new ecological categories (phytobenthos and zooplankton), and ii) use of averaged CMIST results to interpret general risk patterns of ecological categories. This study is also the first to use CMIST scores to highlight common source regions and connected ports for the highest risk species. In a scenario of climate change and increasing ship traffic, this information can be used to support management actions such as the creation of watch lists to inform adaptive management for preventing AIS establishment, and mitigating associated environmental and economic impacts.

Highlights

  • To stop biodiversity loss, Aichi Biodiversity Target 9 from The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 states that invasive species and their pathways need to be identified and managed to take effective actions to prevent introductions and establishments (CBD Secretariat, 2010)

  • A total of 14 HRR species was identified for the Hudson Bay Complex: (1) Chionoecetes opilio; (2) Paralithodes camtschaticus; (3) Acartia (Acanthacartia) tonsa; (4) Mya arenaria; (5) Littorina littorea; (6) Codium fragile spp. fragile; (7) Sargassum muticum; (8) Aurelia limbata; (9) Mnemiopsis leidyi; (10) Carcinus maenas; (11) Marenzelleria viridis; (12) Membranipora membranacea; FIGURE 3 | Adjusted Invasion, Impact, and Canadian Marine Invasive Species Tool (CMIST) overall risk scores for ecological categories and taxonomic groups assessed for the Hudson Bay Complex marine ecoregion, including Zoobenthos: (A) barnacles, (B) tunicates, (C) amphipods, (D) other zoobenthos, (E) crabs, (F) mollusks; Phytobenthos: (G) macroalgae; and Zooplankton: (H) copepods, (I) macrozooplankton

  • Zooplankton and phytobenthos have similar mean values for Invasion and Impact, whereas zoobenthos have a wider range of mean values, which is a function of differences in taxonomic group characteristics (Figures 3, 4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Aichi Biodiversity Target 9 from The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 states that invasive species and their pathways need to be identified and managed to take effective actions to prevent introductions and establishments (CBD Secretariat, 2010). A key first step to attain Aichi Biodiversity Target 9, is to identify potential invasive species and assess their likelihood of introduction and impact. The Canadian Arctic is a vast region where remoteness and harsh climate limit opportunities for year-round monitoring and early detection of aquatic invasive species (AIS). In this area, the identification of high-risk species, pathways, and geographic locations is important for informing targeted preventative and surveillance measures to limit introduction and spread of AIS

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call