Abstract
Widespread blood cholesterol screening in childhood is not an effective strategy for decreasing the burden of coronary heart disease in the US population. Screening to identify older children and adolescents at high risk for developing coronary heart disease in early adulthood makes sense, but only if it is limited to individuals with positive family histories and if the cutoff point for further diagnosis and treatment is set high enough so that the benefits clearly outweigh the risks. These conditions are met for the case of the heterozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia, which accounts for approximately 5% of cases of premature coronary heart disease. Screening for familial hypercholesterolemia is defensible because of (1) the serious prognosis and relatively high prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia, (2) the existence of appropriate initial screening and follow-up diagnostic tests, (3) the fact that family history-directed screening is likely to be effective in detecting affected individuals, and (4) the apparent effectiveness of intervention in adolescence for a disease that would otherwise manifest in early adulthood.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.