Screening for Body Dysmorphic Disorder in Plastic Surgery Patients.

Abstract

The Australian medical board, the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) has recently introduced new regulations mandating providers of cosmetic surgery undertake a clinical screen for body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) in all potential cosmetic surgery patients. The assessment must be conducted by the surgeon using a validated psychological screening tool. The aims of this paper are to discuss the key clinical characteristics of BDD before reviewing currently validated screening tools that would meet this new regulatory requirement, and which may be most applicable to a busy plastic surgery practice. A literature search identified 1164 titles, of which 229 titles were retrieved for abstract screening. Six studies were identified that validated BDD screening tools in a setting relevant to cosmetic plastic surgery. Six validated screening were identified: BDD Questionnaire (BDDQ), BDD Questionnaire Dermatology Version (BDDQ-DV), BDD Questionnaire Aesthetic Surgery (BDDQ-AS), Cosmetic Procedure Screening Questionnaire (COPS), Body Dysmorphia Symptom Scale (BDSS) and the BDD Screening Test (BDD-ST). Our group practice has chosen to adopt the BDDQ-AS to meet the AHPRA regulator requirement for BDD screening based on its robust validation and ease of use in clinical practice, consisting of a seven-item self-report questionnaire that can be reliably completed in 1-2 minutes in most cases. Of the six screening tools for body dysmorphic disorder available for use in clinical practice that have been validated in a cosmetic population setting, we have chosen to use the BDD Questionnaire Aesthetic Surgery (BDDQ-AS). To date all available validated screening tools are based on the DSM-IV, and further work to develop a validated screening tool based on the revised definition of BDD in the DSM-V is recommended, with a particular focus on items relating to repetitive physical or mental behaviours. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .