Abstract

IntroductionScreening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; however, the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known. This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting.MethodsA cross-sectional mixed methods census survey of 418 HCPs from 59 inner-city practices (Nottingham, UK) was conducted between October-December 2014. Postal and web-surveys ascertained data on existing methods, knowledge, skills, attitudes, barriers and facilitators to AF screening using Likert scale and open-ended questions. Responses, categorized according to HCP group, were summarized using proportions, adjusting for clustering by practice, with 95% C.Is and free-text responses using thematic analysis.ResultsAt least one General Practitioner (GP) responded from 48 (81%) practices. There were 212/418 (51%) respondents; 118/229 GPs, 67/129 nurses [50 practice nurses; 17 Nurse Practitioners (NPs)], 27/60 healthcare assistants (HCAs). 39/48 (81%) practices had an ECG machine and diagnosed AF in-house. Non-GP HCPs reported having less knowledge about ECG interpretation, diagnosing and treating AF than GPs. A greater proportion of non-GP HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training specifically for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion (95% CI) GPs: 11.9% (6.8–20.0); HCAs: 37.0% (21.7–55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0–59.0); NPs 41.2% (21.9–63.7)]. Barriers included time, workload and capacity to undertake screening activities, although training to diagnose and manage AF was a required facilitator.ConclusionInner-city general practices were found to have adequate access to resources for AF screening. There is enthusiasm by non-GP HCPs to up-skill in the diagnosis and management of AF and they may have a role in future AF screening. However, organisational barriers, such as lack of time, staff and capacity, should be overcome for AF screening to be feasibly implemented within primary care.

Highlights

  • Screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in primary care has been recommended; the views of healthcare professionals (HCPs) are not known

  • A greater proportion of non-General Practitioner (GP) HCPs reported they would benefit from ECG training for AF diagnosis than GPs [proportion GPs: 11.9% (6.8–20.0); healthcare assistants (HCAs): 37.0% (21.7–55.5); nurses: 44.0% (30.0–59.0); Nurse Practitioners (NPs) 41.2% (21.9–63.7)]

  • The sensitivities for primary care professionals were similar to automated software, accuracy of diagnosing AF was lower for nurses than General Practitioners (GPs).[8]. These findings suggest that 12-lead ECG interpretation by primary HCPs could be better and, if screening were implemented within primary care without addressing this issue, the effectiveness of screening could potentially be undermined

Read more

Summary

Objectives

This study aimed to determine the opinions of HCP about the feasibility of implementing screening within a primary care setting. This study aimed to determine existing methods used for diagnosing AF within primary care, and to determine and compare the knowledge, skills and attitudes (KSA) and opinions of HCPs for AF screening within this setting

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call