Abstract

Vulval squamous cell carcinoma is relatively rare; however, up to 20% of women have significant vulval symptoms during their lifetime. Formal screening programmes for vulval disease have not been established. The evidence for the use of vulval cytology and vulvoscopy is reviewed. No randomised-controlled trials have compared follow-up regimens, and although a few consensus documents have been published, formal guidelines are lacking in Grade A evidence. With increasing pressure on healthcare resources, the possibility of identifying high-risk groups to optimise the use of follow up in specialist clinics is explored. Vulval disease is uncommon and there is no evidence that screening would decrease incidence. If high-risk groups can be identified, follow up should take place in specialised vulval clinics with experienced clinicians who are trained in vulval disease. Women with uncomplicated vulval conditions should be discharged to patient-initiated follow up or primary care. Central to the reduction of mortality and morbidity is increased awareness of vulval conditions among women and improved education of healthcare professionals, with particular understanding of the importance of physical examination.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.