Abstract
This article reviews the codification of the international standard for maritime territorial claims, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), in context of a transformation in the concept of territorial sovereignty. Shifting climate conditions, new technologies for oil extraction, and increasing international demand—factors that make expensive extraction more viable—have recently created a “Scramble for the Arctic,” featuring competing maritime claims by Russia, Canada, Denmark, Norway and the United States. As territorial disputes are one of the most common correlates to militarized conflict, potential insight for avoiding war through a neoliberal institutional framework is of interest. The resolution of the “arctic scramble” also holds a precedent-setting promise, as there are similar pending crises in Antarctica and contentious territorial claims in the South China Sea. Will these nations observe the rule of international law and dispute resolution procedures set forth in UNCLOS, or will we observe a twentieth century neo-imperial echo to the Scramble for Africa?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.