Abstract

BackgroundThe objectives of this scoping review are to investigate the characteristics assessed by existing vulnerability indices and the health outcomes achieved by applying them to people experiencing homelessness. This review forms part of the development and implementation of a novel tool to prioritise people experiencing homelessness for healthcare based on their need and capacity to access healthcare.MethodsIncluded papers were primary research, published in the English language, participants were experiencing homelessness and aged over 18 years at the time of the study, a vulnerability index was used in the study, sample size was greater than 30, and the study had a health focus. Databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science, between January-April 2020. The Joanna Briggs Appraisal criteria were used to quality appraise the included studies. Results were synthesised narratively.ResultsSix papers were included, a total of 27,509 participants. The reported use of the indices varied; they included screening and profiling homeless populations, comparing homeless populations, and two studies evaluated the predictive capacity, reliability and validity of the indices. One vulnerability index focused on screening for human immunodeficiency virus, one used a 50-item index and four used a nine-item index. No direct health outcomes were reported from applying the vulnerability indices. The studies identified limitations of using vulnerability indices, including the potential bias of relying on self-reported data and two studies highlighted the need for further psychometric testing to ensure validity and reliability of the indices.DiscussionThe sample of included studies was small. Vulnerability indices are reportedly a useful and easily accessible method of gaining valuable data on the health status and health needs of people experiencing homelessness. The variety of characteristics included in the vulnerability indices suggests the importance of tailoring vulnerability indices to the needs of the population to which it is to be applied. Conducting appropriate psychometric testing is critical so that an index can be used to accurately inform decision making and accurately prioritise people experiencing homelessness who are most at risk of mortality and morbidity. A specific tool that prioritises people experiencing homelessness for access to health care is not yet available. The review was funded by a St Vincent’s Network Inclusive Health grant.

Highlights

  • This scoping review investigates the characteristics assessed by existing vulnerability indices and the health outcomes achieved by applying them to people experiencing homelessness

  • One vulnerability index focused on screening for human immunodeficiency virus, one used a 50-item index and four used a nine-item index

  • Cross sectional study using a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vulnerability tool developed by the authors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This scoping review investigates the characteristics assessed by existing vulnerability indices and the health outcomes achieved by applying them to people experiencing homelessness. Vulnerability indices are used to assess mortality and morbidity of people experiencing homelessness in order to prioritise them for housing. This review underpins the development of a novel tool to prioritise people experiencing homelessness for healthcare (rather than housing) based on an assessment of their healthcare need and their capacity to access healthcare. The increased mortality has been explained by the high exposure to substance use, smoking tobacco and mental illness [9] The objectives of this scoping review are to investigate the characteristics assessed by existing vulnerability indices and the health outcomes achieved by applying them to people experiencing homelessness. This review forms part of the development and implementation of a novel tool to prioritise people experiencing homelessness for healthcare based on their need and capacity to access healthcare

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call