Abstract
The rise of narcotics circulation in recent years, has caused many losses not only economic losses but the loss of a generation of people who have lost common sense to become victims of life, even though in a very productive age. Based on this condition, the legal policy taken by the government by making maximum legal sanctions for drug dealers and drug dealers with a maximum sentence of life or death sentence. This writing aims to examine the position and function of scientific testimony on the death penalty for narcotics offenders and the perspective of North Sumatra BNN and North Sumatra Regional Police on scientific testimony on the death penalty for narcotics offenders. The results of this study indicate that the use of scientific testimony in criminal cases will scientifically reveal narcotics criminal cases, so that it can be seen what articles can be applied in narcotics crime cases, that the position and function of scientific testimony against capital punishment for narcotic offenders is as a tool or means to supplement other evidence whether a suspect is indeed eligible for a death sentence or not and also whether or not a recommendation from the results of scientific testimony can change the law enforcement authorities not to impose the death penalty for narcotics offenders depending, whether the investigator or the investigator is willing to use information from the letter of the results.
Highlights
The rise of narcotics circulation in recent years, has caused many losses economic losses but the loss of a generation of people who have lost common sense to become victims of life, even though in a very productive age
The results of this study indicate that the use of scientific testimony in criminal cases will scientifically reveal narcotics criminal cases, so that it can be seen what articles can be applied in narcotics crime cases, that the position and function of scientific testimony against capital punishment for narcotic offenders is as a tool or means to supplement other evidence whether a suspect is indeed eligible for a death sentence or not and also whether or not a recommendation from the results of scientific testimony can change the law enforcement authorities not to impose the death penalty for narcotics offenders depending, whether the investigator or the investigator is willing to use information from the letter of the results
SIMPULAN Kedudukan dan fungsi scientific testimoni terhadap hukuman mati bagi pelaku tindak pidana narkotika adalah sebagai alat atau sarana untuk melengkapi alat bukti lainnya apakah seorang tersangka memang layak untuk di jatuhi hukuman mati atau tidak
Summary
The rise of narcotics circulation in recent years, has caused many losses economic losses but the loss of a generation of people who have lost common sense to become victims of life, even though in a very productive age. Sedangkan Pemeriksaan laboratoris kriminalistik barang bukti adalah pemeriksaan terhadap barang bukti yang diperoleh dari pencarian, pengambilan, penyitaan, pengamanan dan pengiriman petugas Polri atau instansi penegak hukum lainnya, yang dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode ilmiah di Labfor Polri, agar barang bukti yang telah diperiksa dapat dijadikan sebagai salah satu alat bukti yang sah sesuai Pasal 1 ayat 7 Perkap No 10 Tahun 2009.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS)
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
