Scientific evidence for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery

Abstract

Innovative surgical techniques in colorectal surgery aim to provide diminished surgical injury and at least equivalent or even improved quality of treatment and oncological results. High level clinical studies are mandatory to examine the feasibility and advantages (or disadvantages) of new operative techniques. Laparoscopic colonic resection for cancer has been investigated with respect to safety and oncological quality in various prospective randomized studies (COST study, COLOR-I and CLASICC). The minimally invasive procedure is feasible and safe which was demonstrated in many studies but can these results be extrapolated to laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery? The short term outcomes of the COLOR-II trial were published recently and laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer was not found to be inferior compared to open resection. Recovery after laparoscopic surgery was better than after open surgery. Laparoscopic surgery was found to have significant advantages with respect to blood loss, operating time, use of pain medication, early restoration of bowel function and reduction of hospital stay as well as the lateral safety margins in the distal third of the rectum. The long-term results focussing on local recurrence showed a positive trend in favor of laparoscopic rectal surgery and will be published shortly. Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) appears to have clinically measurable short-term advantages in patients with primary rectal cancer based on the evidence of randomized studies. Laparoscopic rectal cancer resection may become the gold standard in the future.